Mao Yushi 100 years of experience shows that learning from the West more good than harm

 Mao Yushi: 100 years of experience shows that learning from the West more good than harm
Sohu Financial News July 9, 2008, sponsored by the Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, China Minsheng Bank, Beijing Shi Ji Wenjing Culture Communication Co., Ltd. in association with Mr. presentations, Mr Fan Gang, Mr. Zhou Qiren and Mr. Chen Zhiwu were seated in the guest seat on the reform of 30 years to express their views.
today's four topics have already said, first of all from their point of this book do a brief introduction, followed by a please Maoxian Sheng.
Mao Yushi: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for coming, I was about 30 years of reform following the Review of .30 of a person in almost half my life, a very long time. I see this time round to see that from a historical perspective we need to review it, that is from a longer-term look at this 30-year historical period. We can also start from the liberation, that is 60 years or from the Republic of China That began a hundred years, I think it is more appropriate to coordinate the Opium War in 1840, because that marks the turning point is aware of their lagging behind in China, began to the foreign learning, the pursuit of modernization, more than 160 years in 1840 to the present, I was fortunate to witness see the back half of the 160 years is a very tortuous process, first we admit it or not China is a backward, what China is a big turning point backward, as never to think that China is the best in the world, and later we found to play But the British found that foreigners have very sophisticated technology, admit that behind the very painful, very reluctantly, after repeated struggles, we look at history to know, do not think China Qing high officials not to admit that they can not, to foreign study, the struggle is very intense, recognition of learning from foreign countries.
second question down, learn what country? in the late Qing Dynasty and early Ming, China's main role models in Japan, because Japan accepted the idea of modernization earlier, and they from China, very close, now we go to America a dozen hours to that time to the United States by boat to sit for two months to go to Japan for two days to come, whether in politics, the economy, our goal against Japan, the Revolution's success is largely relying on the help of Japan, Sun Yat-sen fled to Japan to touch a thing to go, Huang activities of these people are in Japan. we learn what it Until now there are many terms are translated from the Japanese, when the Qing Dynasty and early Ming major study in Japan. Then Hu to the U.S. and Europe to promote learning, but this time not so long, so after our liberation, education of the Soviet Union, Soviet Union, the political school one-party dictatorship, the Soviet planned economy, the economic school, the example of the wrong school, so the Soviet Union collapsed himself. After the fall of the Soviet Union reformed its own, having failed to make out, after that time, after the Cultural Revolution in China, began to find a way, Hua Guofeng took office, China sent a lot of people went abroad to study, first a study of Romania, the second school in Yugoslavia, Romania and Yugoslavia are the most typical failure, at that time as our example.
we do not want to learn West, because the West is imperialism to be dying, we are its grave-diggers, how will it learn? Take a little socialist camp is done well, such as East Germany, the Czech Republic, we feel it is too Westernization, to learn oriental, Yugoslavia and Romania. until the real reform and opening up, and slowly we think need to learn from the West. we review this history from the West realize that the process is not very smooth, very complex process, to this day can not say completely solve the problem, there are many problems that all of our reform is to learn from the West, of course, if there is truth in this, but we do learn from the West and the loss of income to compare, I think the income greatly exceed the losses. to take our technology is absolutely no doubt learning from the West. in the system to learn how much we square it? can be said that the success of all aspects of learning from the West, the People's Congress is learning from the West, the emperor , the Empress Dowager do not need the people's congress, the constitution is imported, environmental protection is imported, not that we do out of state. the stock market, the SFC, the banks, which are imported, we get a great convenience, saving a lot of time, saving the cost of learning. We step Kuashang Qu, and is called the advantage. Of course, we say that there are many problems learning side, the West overcome this problems, we have not overcome, it is more than we made, so today need to be resolved is how the thinking in the mainstream, to promote the fine culture of China.
the past hundred years, the international situation have a very big change, especially after the Cold War, it changes what is characteristic? is the national security problem is getting smaller, the time in the Republic of China in the Qing Dynasty, China's biggest task is to rescue people, is not to be conquered, the task of national salvation above all, national, construction are alone, the most important thing is salvation . But after World War II, especially after the end of the Cold War, I feel the international environment has a very big change, this change is characterized by more countries to make decisions by the people, while the common people, and there is no hatred between people, Chinese people with the Americans with the Japanese, people do not hate, conflicts between countries are created, not what problems people have in mind is to provoke some people up on the inside, while others benefit from it, he wants to expand military he wants to gain power, he made a number of contradictions, in fact, national security, the problem with 50 years ago, 100 years ago, this is not a big problem, change the environment very important to us, we are far from understanding the environment changes in how important our daily life. Because of the time, I have about ten minutes, thank you! (I reviewed the manuscript without the author)
Mao Yushi: five major issues such as the challenges of inflation
Sohu Finance SMEs News July 9, 2008, sponsored by the Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, China Minsheng Bank, Beijing Shi Ji Wenjing Culture Communication Company Limited grand opening of the University Guanghua School of Management. Following the press conference, Mr. Mao Yushi.
Moderator: you ask an economist, now faces the challenges of business survival, we are talking about the cost of labor increased the years of export-oriented Since the export tax rebate and economic pressure on exchange rate policy, but also led to the coast of Fujian, Guangdong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces near-collapse of a large number of small and medium enterprises, labor costs, expensive yuan. In this case, ask the company how to ride out the storm, the Government should How to help non-public economy and SMEs in particular, they solve a lot of the employment problem, and today they are the problems to appreciation of the renminbi, to refund to the national macro-control, Professor Mao ask how to solve these problems?
Mao Yushi: In reply to this problem before for everyone to think out a problem, others money, others make a fortune, good or bad for me, very simple question. may have two answers, there is a answer someone else's money is not good for me because he has more potential to exploit us, he used his money to exploit us, so I'm poorer. there is an answer, people have money in it for me, I can dip light, these two you to think about the answer, which in the end answer to.
This is not a small problem, is a very big problem. I talk about my answer, my answer is the latter part, I think that other people have money in it for me . Chinese people like immigrants to the United States, even to a restaurant washing dishes, and earn more money, why? have the same labor to get more money because the United States restaurants, diners, his high income, so the dishes who was also high. let's use me, I now have more than ten times the income than in the past, is not I've got it ten times bigger? not that big, get 50 dollars a thousand words before royalties, and now take 500 do not have much money, give me so many people are not pay royalties? He has earned not only lost because he took my article, take my books to sell, buy books articles, and they have high income , do not care about you, so their high income, high income to me.
power based on wealth can be tolerant with each other, the opposite is the official position of power based on mutually exclusive and only one emperor of a country can not There are two, one, only a minister of the Ministry, only one mayor of a city. If a society is based on official position of power, it must be fought constantly. But the power of wealth is not based, as you make a fortune and I wealth, good fortune for me. The social structure based on wealth, if the power is society towards prosperity. Our analysis of this issue, add the views of Professor Zhang Weiying. From the view of human society, that is, from investment based on the power of wealth into power based on wealth, a lot of changes happening here, the rich can play, you can fly, you can eat delicacies, money hungry people still empty stomach. money what is the major cause of social inequality causes the aircraft, and how to solve this problem, it is very difficult to do.
provided the following answer to the question moderator. business survival. Now there are several reasons for enterprises to survive the difficulties, the first One is labor costs. Second, the RMB appreciation, many export enterprises which makes it difficult. Third, the short-inflation, money supply is tight, the loan is very difficult. Fourth, the energy prices. Fifth, the environment rising costs, now talk about environmental protection, you have to regulate environmental protection, we must spend money.
so many problems, from another point of view, it is a good thing. labor costs, that is certainly good, everyone incomes , what is not. exchange rate of the yuan rise, we have purchasing power, and this is a good thing. environmental costs, we have to protect the environment, this is a good thing. But the financial market is not liberalized, when the monetary tightening, bitter Le inequality. This is a problem, some do not look the other it is a problem, it is an opportunity, in the end is the problem or opportunity? that you want to see the macro side, the macro side in the first quarter GDP growth was 10.6 %, a little bit down from last year, but the attitude is basically up.
the GDP rose a point will be able to offset a chunk of those problems. We buy stocks, look at the fundamentals of the company how, say economic fundamentals side, that is GDP, GDP increase in these problems, environmental issues, exchange rate, and so have room for adjustment, so from another perspective, this is precisely the opportunity of China's economic transformation, we can not always rely on cheap labor, always on low waste of raw materials, materials, energy, waste the structure of the environment, we must change, not always repeat the backward country, we need to become advanced countries, these changes make us just a step towards a higher chance of economic structure, I think the Government now needs to help these businesses to help them overcome. We say that reform is not easy, and you want to improve energy efficiency and reduce environmental consumption, improve wages, under these enterprises have great strength, to do great input, try to help these local governments, the people have the opportunity to also willing to help them. This is another essay, how to help the people business, we do not have time carefully discussed. Some say this for your reference. (manuscript without author review)
Mao Yushi: people are getting richer, we can easily become rich
Sohu Financial News July 9, 2008, sponsored by the Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, China Minsheng Bank, Beijing Shi Ji Wenjing Culture Communication Company Limited would like to ask a question about Professor Mao Yushi, others if the rich, good for me, you can benefit from them. But in June publicly accused Bush now demand higher food prices is due to a substantial increase in India, it was caused by international food prices, and some time before the financial Biao also published an article, pointing out that developing countries such as China and India, should not be that developed countries like the United States, and his people did not like the United States had the kind of people live their path, so that inadequate energy supply will cause the earth to make earth overwhelmed. Like Bush, Rice to this view, will have with you the compatibility of the proposed conflict? do not know how you view this issue. There is also a question to ask what Professor Zhou Qiren. Now the hot money in the international financial crisis since Vietnam, the hot money has led to everyone's attention, according to relevant statistics, China from January 2008 to May, the average monthly number of hot money into China 30 billion or so, but now in China, China's stock market is stuck, the Chinese property market is now in the price, into China in the end a large number of hot money is now floating in which I do not know Professor Zhou Qiren can explain the problem.
Mao Yushi: I answer your questions. First, I agree with the views of Zhou Qiren, if the currency under control, then the price level will not change, food prices, is not people who suffer food consumption, production of food people take advantage of it? the short term this is However, the long term, prices reflect scarcity, if a scarce commodity, and he had to price increases, prices to bad he did not, and he let everyone prudent use of prices, save it and use other things that are not scarce to replace it.
this problem is particularly great importance, others make money for me is good or bad, if people have more money, to me is a bad thing, or I so poor that you get rich, this society is very dangerous, because the rich and the poor are always there, regardless of which community has, I am so poor, because you exploited me, and I exploited the poor, and this is a view. Another point of view, I hope the poor can become rich, because people are getting richer, I might become rich. It is two completely different views, which is the development of human history, because this view of the different, resulting in a different view. Today, the time too short, the problem can only say this, I hope you think about this question very well, that a subject, positive, negative, think about it, it figured out, for us to understand the market economy itself is very great importance. And again, a person to make money by other people, other people make money that I make money on the island, there is no such thing, he was making money by others, and the others make money, you can not make a sale , you make other people lose out, not a fool, I'm a money person, you are a profitable, you from the perspective of society as a whole, is the same as I told you, you earn, I earn , because you make money I can make money. on the evolution of our system is significant. (I reviewed the manuscript without the author)